Unlike traditional carbide slitting circular knives that pursue extreme wear resistance, the cermet slitting circular knife focuses on a delicate balance between "adequacy, stability, and economy." Its internal structure is scientifically optimized to maintain a good cutting edge condition during high-speed continuous slitting, effectively reducing abnormal chipping and unplanned wear.
In the current market environment of frequent fluctuations in tungsten carbide prices, this product helps customers significantly reduce tool procurement and usage costs, especially suitable for high-volume, standardized, and long-cycle slitting production lines.
Low Overall Cost of Use
Optimized tungsten content, controllable material costs, and more competitive cost per unit slitting length.
Excellent Edge Stability
Improved grain structure and bonding phase design significantly reduce the probability of micro-chipping.
Suitable for High-Speed Continuous Slitting
Low cutting resistance and low heat generation help maintain consistent cut surface quality.
Strong Batch Consistency
Mature and stable process, suitable for long-term, repetitive procurement needs.
High Customization Flexibility
Supports customized solutions for various sizes, blade types, and specific application scenarios.
|
(OD-ID-T/mm) |
Blade Type: |
Surface treatment |
|
Customizable as needed |
Single-edge/ Double-edge/ Micro-beveling blade |
Optional anti-stick, anti-friction, and other functional coatings |
The cermet slitting circular blade is particularly suitable for slitting the following industries and materials:
Packaging and Printing Industry Slitting of films, paper, and composite materials
Tape and Label Industry
BOPP, PET, PVC, protective films, etc.
New Energy Related Auxiliary Materials
Lithium battery separators, some coating materials
Other Continuous Slitting Scenarios
Conditions with high cost control requirements and relatively low impact loads
Q1: Can the cermet slitting circular blade completely replace cemented carbide?
Not suitable for all scenarios, but in most stable, non-high-impact slitting conditions, cermet has the potential to replace it and is a more cost-effective choice.
Q2: Is its service life necessarily shorter than that of cemented carbide?
Under extremely harsh conditions, its wear resistance may be inferior to that of cemented carbide. However, in most actual production scenarios, its lifespan is sufficient to meet requirements, and its cost per slitting cycle is more advantageous.
Q3: Is cermet prone to chipping?
Early products did have shortcomings in this regard. With continuous upgrades in materials and processes, its resistance to micro-chipping has been significantly improved, making it suitable for standardized, continuously operating slitting equipment.